Shaping ability of ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments in simulated root canals

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.34.002

Abstract

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Currently, the nickel-titanium file has no uniform international standards for clinical use, and several nickel-titanium systems have unique designs in terms of cross-sectional shape, taper change, composition number, central steel volume, and cutting edge angle, so there are some differences in cleanup capability, security, and cutting efficiency. ProTaper Next is developed based on the ProTaper Universal, and its composition number, blade cross-sectional shape, contact point with the root canal wall and the tip tapers are all improved.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the shaping ability between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments by preparing the simulated root canals.

METHODS: Two groups of resin blocks were prepared by ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal respectively. Preparation time and incidence of canal aberration and instruments failure were recorded. After preparation, the images taken before and after preparation were superimposed and analyzed by software Adobe Photoshop v7.0. We measured the amount of resin removed at the inner and outer canal walls. The centering ability was also assessed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of canal aberration. ProTaper Next was faster than ProTaper Universal to prepare canals (P < 0.05). Both instruments caused apical transportation. ProTaper Universal F2 removed more materials than ProTaper Next X2 at the inner canal walls (P < 0.05). ProTaper Next showed better centering ability than ProTaper Universal in most levels (P < 0.05). Two instruments showed good performance in preparation but both created some apical transportation. However, the ProTaper Next was better in maintaining the original form of curved canal with safety and higher efficiency.

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点：生物材料；骨生物材料; 口腔生物材料; 纳米材料; 缓释材料; 材料相容性；组织工程

全文链接：

Key words: nickel, titanium, root canal preparation tissue engineering

CLC Number:

R318

Liu Wen-zhe, Chen Guang-sheng. Shaping ability of ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments in simulated root canals[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2014, 18(34): 5418-5422.

Figures/Tables 2

References

[1] 林正梅,凌均棨,高燕,等.两种镍钛机动预备器械根管清理效果的电镜观察[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2005,26(6):707-710.
[2] 杨国斌,郑玉露,许为群,等.机用ProTaper锉和Flexofile不锈钢锉根管成形能力的对比研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2007,25(4): 386-389.
[3] 白玉龙,陈阵,王永兰,等.3种机用镍钛锉对弯曲根管成形能力的比较[J].口腔医学研究,2012,28(5):468-471.
[4] Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, et al. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):295-298.
[5] Riitano F. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET): acrown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, op-erative procedure and instruments. Int Endod J. 2005;38(8):575-587.
[6] Jeffrey R, Brian E, Mark D, et al. Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium endodontic file systems in simulated s-shaped root canals. J Endodon. 2012;12(38):1618-1621.
[7] Huang DM, Luo HX, Zhang L, et al. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated Sshaped canals. J Endodon. 2007;33(8): 986-989.
[8] Griffiths IT, Bryant ST, Dummer PM, et al. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals. Int Endod J. 2000;33(4):346-354.
[9] Griffiths IT, Chassot AL, Nascimento MF, et al. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec SC rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals. Int Endod J. 2001;34(2):107-112.
[10] 尼娜,彭彬.TF与ProTaper在树脂根管中成形能力的比较研究[J].口腔医学研究,2012,28(5):453-456.
[11] Gergi R, Rjeily JA, Sader J, et al. Comparison of canal and centering ability of Twisted Files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-Files by using computed tomography. J Endodon. 2010;36(5):904-907.
[12] Aydin C, Inan U, Yasar S, et al. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(3):e92-97.
[13] Gergi R, Rjeily JA, Sader J, et al. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of Twisted Files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-Files by using computed tomograohy. J Endodon. 2010;36(5): 904-907.
[14] Tasdemir L, Aydemir H, Inan U,et al. Canan preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2005;38(6):402-408.
[15] Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T, et al. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39:196-202.
[16] 罗红霞,张岚,谭红,等.可变锥度联合标准锥度的镍钛器械预备“S”形树脂根管的成形效果[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2007,23(6): 836-839.
[17] Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004; 30(8):559-567.
[18] Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, et al. Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2(2):33-38.
[19] Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY, et al. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod. 2000;26(12):719-723.
[20] Zare JM, Mirzakouchaki P, Mousavi E, et al. Fracture strength of mesiobuccal roots following canal preparation with hand and rotary instrumentation: an in vitro study. Iran Endod J. 2011;6(3):125-128.
[21] Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium engine and McXim rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: part1. Int Endod J. 2002;30(3):262-269.
[22] Paque F, Musch U, Hulsman M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J. 2005;38(1):8-16.
[23] 王嘉德,高学军.牙体牙髓病学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
[24] 张瑜,彭彬,任小琼,等.ProTaper和ProTaper Universal机用镍钛器械在模拟根管内成形能力的研究[J].口腔医学研究, 2011, 27(6): 468-470.
[25] Vahid A, Roohi N, Zayeri F, et al. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length. Aust Endod J. 2009;35(2):93-97.
[26] Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel- titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Enciod. 2011;37:1293-1295.
[27] Sonntag D, Ott M, Kook K, et al. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper. Aust Endod J. 2007; 33(2):73-81.
[28] Park SY, Cheung GS, Yum J, et al. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010; 36:1200-1204.
[29] Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, et al. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: reciproc versus wave one. J Ended. 2012;38:541-544.
[30] 赵高峰,徐琼,范兵.不锈钢K锉和镍钛K锉预备弯曲根管效果的比较研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2003;19(9):545-547.
[31] 杨利杰,吴红崑.根管成形评价方法的研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2010,37(5):562-565.